That you didn't comment on even one item in the list I sent shows you're still lost in Whataboutistan and your ignorance of its contents.

That's why you sound like a Japanese school textbook instead of the Japanese teacher whose book was censored and banned from schools because it told the truth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_history_textbook_controversies

So you're joining the Japanese PMs who have prayed at the Yasukuni shrine for Class A war criminals.

Any Whataboutist list of Anglo-American crimes is currently as irrelevant as:

* The British mass shooting of peaceful Indian protestors in Amritsar in 1919 was during Britain’s battle of Imphal against Japan in 1944–45.

* American counterinsurgency war crimes in 1902 in the Philippines during the battles of Manila and Leyte Gulf in 1944–45.

* The Holodomor and the purges of millions of Ukrainians were during the battles of Stalingrad in 1942–43 and Bagration in June-August 1944.

When history’s menu offers bad vs worse, as it did at Imphal in 1944, in WWII Philippines and on June 23, 1941, choose bad. None of the above isn’t on the menu. Get over it. https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/know-your-russian-useful-idiot-genocide-apologists-a-and-b-800013dd4aed

The same was true in August 1945. The atomic bombings gave Hirohito political cover to "bow to the inevitable" and end the war sooner. This saved at least 100000 Chinese lives and the tens or hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians who would have died in conventional firebombings. If you condemn the atomic bombings, you must also condemn conventional area bombing, which means you condemn waging war on the murderous Japanese Empire itself.

The Japanese war cabinet didn't see the atomic bombings as fundamentally different from the conventional firebombings of Japanese cities that preceded them. The minutes of the war cabinet meeting recounted in Murray Sayle's 1995 NYer article Did the Bomb End the War? show that the military members of the war cabinet were worried more about the Soviet invasion of Manchuria and what it meant for their positions. That's why the military ministers resisted surrender while the civilian ministers in this hybrid regime favored it.

You're also forgetting about the hundreds of thousands of POWs and civilian prisoners of the Japanese who would have died had the war been prolonged or an invasion taken place. Apparently, their lives and those in Japanese-occupied are valueless.

Any US president who didn't use the bomb while knowing it was ready would have been politically or literally lynched for risking the lives of American POWs by prolonging the war.

Without the atomic bombings Stalin's Hokkaido invasion and occupation plan would have gone forward, leading to a Japan divided like Germany. Then imagine the Cuban missile crisis in 1962 without the vaccination mark of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Ever wonder why the Japanese almost always talk only about Hiroshima when invoking their atomic victimhood? Because Nagasaki was filled with Korean slave laborers--gaijin. It was also the most Christian city in Japan, with a Dutch village on an island in the harbor. They don't view Nagasaki as truly Japanese.

These are just some more facts to show how you invoke knowledge-free ahistorical moral outrage at the atomic bombings while ignoring facts and context.