Jung discredited himself with genocide-enabling anti-semitic rhetoric. To deny this propagates revisionist history of the Holocaust. And we know where that leads: "Let’s look at the facts. One camp avows that Jung was a true-blue anti-Semite, and there’s plenty to back that up. In 1934, while in Germany, Jung published an article that included this statement: “The Aryan unconscious has a greater potential than the Jewish unconscious.” Though Jung said he maintained close friendships with German Jews throughout the 1930s, he appeared to not mind working for the Nazi-established Goring Institute of Psychology, as well as serving as president of the Nazi-dominated International General Society for Psychotherapy. “The Jew,” he once wrote, “…has never yet created a cultural form of his own and as far as we can see never will.” (https://www.jta.org/jewniverse/2016/was-famous-psychoanalyst-carl-jung-an-anti-semite)

Where is the daylight between Jung and Der Sturmer and Mein Kampf? You can't find it because there is none.

On Peterson: your long diversionary message addressed none of his retrograde misogynistic statements, any one of which disqualifies him as a deeply ignorant troglodyte worth no serious attention. That you don't believe his statements are misogynistic nonsense says more about your views on gender equality than about Peterson.