Here's his score:
As a retired prof, I don't give grades.
2. If you don't distinguish between intentional and unintentional killings, you fail the moral equivalence test.
If you don't note the breathless joy of the livestreaming Hamas terrorists calling their families to celebrate killing "10 Jews with my own hands" and note the total absence of a Jewish equivalent anywhere, you fail the moral equivalence test.
4. To note the authoritarian kleptocracy, family businesses with flags form of governance that prevail in the Arab world is not bigotry, but to live in the reality-based community.
To note the "sexual misery of the Arab world" (to quote Algerian novelist Kamel Daoud) and its authoritarian patriarchal prohibitionism is not bigotry, but realism.
5. Hate speech that's legal in the US and the UK is not in France, Germany and Poland. Mahmoud Abbas' PhD thesis in 9 European countries that ban Holocaust denial would get him jailed. Australia stopped the truck digitally displaying photos of the hostages, while not intervening against those chanting "gas the Jews". That you fail to mention this kind of double standard in "protecting" free speech means you fail the double standard demolition test in this category.
Also your point #5 about free speech depends on the legal system in each country. Here you fail the test for lack of nuance and inability to think like a lawyer about what is substantially a legal question.
Your unnumbered #7 about occupation:
1. Gaza is unoccupied since 2005. Hamas used pipes meant for water systems to build rockets and cement meant for housing to build tunnels. It's kleptocratic leaders are Doha-resident billionaires while its people starve and die while being shot at by Hamas terrorists if they try to escape south. You, of course, ignore this that Palestinian peace activist Bassam Eid tells you (https://www.newsweek.com/im-palestinian-west-bank-hamas-alone-responsible-any-bloodshed-gaza-opinion-1835360) . So you fail the double standard anti-semitism test.
2. Settlements: if Jews can't live on the West Bank then why should Arabs have the right to live in Israel. If Arabs can be citizens of Israel, why can't Jews be citizens of Jordan? (they can't).
3. "unnecessary": Double standard test failed by not noting what any other state would do when faced with a similar invasion and deliberate, enthusiastic livestreamed mass murder and hostage taking of its citizens. I provided the obvious counterfactuals, which you ignored.
4. "hospitals": Hamas human shield business model has turned hospitals into military targets by locating weapons and military infrastructure in and under them. The Geneva Convention's clause about this says this is a war crime (https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/war-crimes.shtml)
Your failure to note the explicit and well-documented advocacy of this human shield business model by Hamas' leaders marks your final paragraph as double standard anti-semitism. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=memri.org+hamas+human+shields+martyrs&atb=v310-1&ia=news
Applying moral symmetry or equivalence to Jews where there is none is the very definition of double-standard anti-semitism that your response engages in.
